이 출금은 **12개월간** Cardano의 핵심 저장소인 오픈소스 커뮤니티 소유 거버넌스 도구 세트인 GovTool의 완전한 유지보수 및 개발 자금을 지원함.

GovTool은 에이다(ADA) 보유자가 등록, 위임, 제안, 투표, 결과 투명 조회를 할 수 있게 함.

ByronNetwork, WeDeliver, LidoNation, Dquadrant으로 구성된 Cardano GovTool 컨소시엄과 추가 오픈소스 기여자가 활발히 유지·확장하며, Governance Tools Working Group이 방향을 제시함.

자금 지원은 운영 안정성, 커뮤니티 기여 인센티브, GovTool 오픈소스 코드 및 API를 사용하는 다른 오픈소스 거버넌스 도구 지원, 모든 거버넌스 분야의 기능적 업데이트 가속화를 보장함.

미사용 자금은 Cardano 재무부로 반환됨.

이 출금은 ₳1.15M(에이다 115만) 승인된 예산에 따른 것으로, Intersect가 스마트 계약 프레임워크를 통해 관리하며, 제안된 솔루션, 예산 정렬, 출금 금액을 명확히 함[1][2][6].

---

**주요 기능**

- 거버넌스 액션 조회 및 투표

- 직접 투표자 등록 및 DRep(Delegated Representative) 등록

- 투표 권한 위임 및 제안 제출

- 투명한 결과 확인

**운영 및 개발**

- Intersect가 오픈소스화 및 커뮤니티 소유화 지원

- 4개 팀(ByronNetwork, WeDeliver, LidoNation, Dquadrant)이 핵심 기능 개발 및 유지보수 담당

- 커뮤니티 참여와 피드백을 반영해 지속 발전 중[1][4][6].

---

**주석**

- DRep: Delegated Representative, 투표 권한을 위임받아 거버넌스 참여하는 대표자

- GovTool: Cardano 거버넌스 참여를 위한 오픈소스 플랫폼

- Intersect: Cardano 거버넌스 도구 관리 및 지원 조직

이 제안은 거버넌스 참여가 분산되지 못하거나 폐쇄형, 사유화된 상업 도구에 의존하는 위험을 해결함.

Cardano의 Voltaire 시대에 GovTool 같은 개방적이고 중립적이며 접근 가능한 플랫폼이 없으면 Cardano의 탈중앙화와 정당성이 약화됨.

GovTool은 이미 널리 사용 중임:

* 170개국 이상에서 50,000+ 고유 메인넷 사용자 보유
* 3개 네트워크 지원
* 수천 건의 거버넌스 트랜잭션 처리
* 1694.io, cardanobudget.com, tempo.vote 등 생태계 도구와 통합됨

자금 지원은 이 인프라를 보존·확장하고 오픈 소스 특성을 유지하며 Cardano 거버넌스의 공공재 역할을 지속하도록 함.

또한 더 많은 개인 기여자를 유입해 유지보수를 분산·효율적으로 만듦.

GovTool 관련 저장소:

* 투표 및 위임 기둥: github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool
* 제안 기둥: github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool-proposal-pillar
* 결과 기둥: github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool-outcomes-pillar

Cardano 거버넌스는 ADA 보유자가 네트워크 방향과 예산 사용을 결정하는 탈중앙화된 커뮤니티 주도 시스템임.

거버넌스는 Delegated Representatives(DReps), Stake Pool Operators(SPOs), Constitutional Committee(CC) 세 역할 중 최소 두 개의 승인을 필요로 하며, 투명성과 공정성을 보장함.

Voltaire 시대에 도입된 온체인 거버넌스는 ADA 보유자가 제안 생성, 투표, 실행을 할 수 있게 하여 네트워크 개발 권한을 커뮤니티에 이양했음.

Cardano 거버넌스는 50개국 이상에서 1,400명 이상의 참여자가 만든 헌법을 기반으로 하며, 광범위한 국제적 합의와 협업을 통해 설계됨.

DReps는 투표 권한을 위임받아 네트워크를 대표하며, 누구나 DRep으로 등록해 거버넌스에 참여 가능함.

이 모든 과정은 Cardano의 탈중앙화, 보안, 네트워크 안정성을 강화하는 데 기여함[1][2][3][4][5].

---

**주석**
- GovTool: Cardano 거버넌스 참여를 위한 오픈 소스 플랫폼
- Delegated Representatives(DReps): 투표 권한을 위임받아 대표로 활동하는 참여자
- Stake Pool Operators(SPOs): 스테이킹 풀 운영자
- Constitutional Committee(CC): 헌법 위원회
- 온체인 거버넌스: 블록체인 상에서 직접 투표와 결정이 이루어지는 시스템

해당 프로젝트 솔루션은 Cardano 거버넌스 툴(GovTool)의 호스팅, 인프라 유지보수, CI-CD, 보안 및 최소 유지보수를 위한 예산을 승인받아 다음과 같이 집행함.

- **호스팅 비용**: 월 $5,000 / ₳6.25k로 Dev, QA, Preview, PreProd, Mainnet 환경 포함
- **인프라 유지보수**: 12개월간 $30,000 / ₳37.5k (0.25 FTE)
- **기여자 인센티브**: ₳150,000은 리포지토리 직접 기여자에게, ₳100,000은 GovTool 코드/API를 활용하는 오픈소스 거버넌스 툴에 배분 예정
- **주요 개발 및 유지보수 인력 배분**: 총 6 FTE 규모로 각 거버넌스 필러(Proposal, Delegation, Voting, Outcomes, Budget Discussion) 및 종합 테스트에 인력 투입, 총 ₳847.5k 예산 배정됨
- ADA-USD 환율 0.8 기준 예산 산정, 미사용 자금은 Cardano Treasury로 반환됨

활성 개발 로드맵은 커뮤니티 주도이며, 주요 계획은 다음과 같음.

- 그룹 기반 DRep 생성 및 운영 지원
- DRep 투표 및 활동 이력 페이지 제공
- 한 트랜잭션 내 다중 투표 기능
- 헌법위원회 투표 내역 공개
- 그룹 제안자 지원 및 CoSponsor 통합으로 거버넌스 액션 비용 크라우드펀딩 가능
- DRep 식별 및 정렬 기능 개선
- 오픈 API 확장 및 기여자 온보딩과 보상 시스템 강화
- 호스팅 및 배포 인프라 최적화

거버넌스는 Intersect 내 거버넌스 툴 워킹 그룹과 GovTool 컨소시엄이 주도하며, 투명한 인센티브 배분과 로드맵 조정을 담당함.

컨소시엄 주요 빌더는 LidoNation, ByronNetwork, WeDeliver, Dquadrant이며, 모두 CIP-1694 이전부터 거버넌스 툴 개발에 참여해왔음.

법적 계약은 오프체인으로 CDH와 각 빌더 간 체결되며, 마일스톤, 검수, 분쟁 해결 절차를 명시함.

프로젝트 진행은 Intersect가 관리하며, 3자 검증자가 마일스톤 완료를 확인 후 지급함.

예산 관리는 Sundae Labs가 개발한 스마트 컨트랙트 프레임워크를 사용하며, TRSC와 PSSC로 자금 관리, Oversight Committee(5개 독립기관)가 온체인 행위 검증을 수행함.

자금은 자동으로 사전 정의된 DRep에 위임되며, 커뮤니티는 cardanotreasury.fi 대시보드를 통해 자금 흐름과 마일스톤 진행 상황을 투명하게 감시 가능함.

---

**주요 용어 주석**
- FTE: Full-Time Equivalent, 전일제 근무자 수 환산 단위
- DRep: Delegated Representative, 위임 대표자
- CIP-1694: Cardano Improvement Proposal 1694, Cardano 거버넌스 관련 제안서
- TRSC: Treasury Reserve Smart Contract, 자금 보관 스마트 계약
- PSSC: Project-Specific Smart Contract, 프로젝트별 스마트 계약
- CDH: Cardano Development Holdings, Cardano 개발 관리 기관
- GovTool: Cardano 거버넌스 툴
- Andamio: 기여자 인센티브 분배 플랫폼

This Treasury Withdrawal funds **12 months** of full active maintenance and development for GovTool, the open-source, community-owned set of governance tools that form Cardano’s core low-barrier platform for participation in on-chain governance.

GovTool enables ada holders to register, delegate, propose, vote, and transparently view outcomes. It is actively maintained and expanded by the Cardano GovTool Consortium which consists of ByronNetwork, WeDeliver, LidoNation and Dquadrant with additional open source contributors, guided by the Governance Tools Working Group.

Funding will ensure operational stability, incentivisation for community contributions, support for other open source governance tools using GovTool open-source code and APIs, and deliver accelerated functional updates across all governance pillars. Any unused funds will be returned to the Cardano Treasury.

This withdrawal follows the approved budget Info Action for ₳1.15M (gov_action1n5sn54mgf47a7men2ryq6ppx88kta4wvenz2qkl4f9v6ppje8easqxwm88m) and it will be administered by Intersect via smart contract framework, fulfilling the constitutional requirement to detail the proposed solution, its alignment to the approved budget, and the amount to be withdrawn.

This proposal addresses the risk of governance participation becoming fragmented or dependent on closed-sourced, privately-owned, commercialised tools. In Cardano’s Voltaire era, without an open, neutral, and accessible platform like GovTool, Cardano’s decentralisation and legitimacy would be weakened.

GovTool is already widely used:

* 50,000+ unique mainnet users across 170+ countries (metrics via [analytics.gov.tools](https://analytics.gov.tools/))
* Three networks supported
* Thousands of governance transactions
* Integration with ecosystem tools (1694.io, cardanobudget.com, tempo.vote, Governancespace.com, budget.cardano.africa, 1694.tools, and others)

Funding will preserve and expand this infrastructure, sustain its open source nature, and ensure it continues to serve as a public good underpinning Cardano governance. Furthermore, it will onboard more individual contributors making maintenance more distributed and efficient going forward.

* [GovTool repository (voting and delegation pillars)](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool/)
* [Proposal Pillar repository](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool-proposal-pillar)
* [Outcomes Pillar repository](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool-outcomes-pillar)

### **Project Solution**

As approved in the Budget Info action, the funding will deliver:

Hosting, infrastructure maintenance, CI-CD, security, and minimum maintenance of

* $5k / ₳6.25k per month for hosting costs (further detailed breakdown [here](https://docs.gov.tools/important-updates/govtool-maintenance-ending-soon/updated-budget-proposal/budget-proposal-faqs#whats-included-in-the-usd5000-per-month-for-hosting)) including Dev, QA environments for the dev of each of the pillars and Preview, PreProd and Mainnet production environments
* $30k / ₳37.5k (0.25 FTE) for 12 months of infrastructure maintenance

Incentives for contributors

* ₳150,000 to be allocated organically via direct contribution on the repos
* ₳100,000 to be allocated to other open source governance tools that provide new and better ways to participate in Cardano Governance leveraging (and where possible expanding) GovTool code or GovTool APIs
* Note: it is planned to utilize the [Andamio platform](https://www.andamio.io/) to transparently distribute incentives to contributors

Active development and maintenance of all pillars

* Overall end-to-end testing $120k / ₳150k (1 FTE)
* Proposal Pillar $120k / ₳150k (1 FTE)
* Delegation Pillar $180k / ₳225k (1.5 FTE)
* Voting Pillar $180k / ₳225k (1.5 FTE)
* Outcomes Pillar $90k / ₳122.5k (0.75 FTE)
* Budget discussion Pillar $60k / ₳75k (0.5 FTE)

This was budgeted based upon the ADA-USD value of 0.8. Any unused funds will be returned to the Cardano Treasury.

#### Active Development - Roadmap

Because GovTool's roadmap is directly defined by the Cardano community, so subject to change and evolution. The best place to check what's coming next is the community backlog [Governance Tools Community Backlog](https://github.com/orgs/IntersectMBO/projects/34/views/1) and the community discussion (recently started to make it easier to define direction) [GovTool discussions](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/govtool/discussions).

However there are some key initiatives that already have clear community support and that this proposal commits to deliver (full details can be seen in the [shared GovTool roadmap](https://docs.gov.tools/important-updates/govtool-maintenance-ending-soon/updated-budget-proposal/proposed-roadmap)). High-level details below (the initiatives are in order of readiness for development):

* Add support to **create and operate group (script-based) DReps**, this will enable smaller DReps to easily come together and build strong coalitions so further distributing voting power.
* **DRep history on the DRep page** to show what that DRep voted on, how and (if available) with what rationale, also show the delegations moving in and out. All this will provide better context to the delegator, also opening new options to sort and filter DReps so supporting liquid democracy.
* **DRep voting history on Governance Actions** to allow DReps and Ada holders to see directly on the Governance Action page, alongside all the context coming from the metadata, the details related to voting, making it easier also to see if their DRep voted as they expected, thus enabling liquid democracy.
* **Ability to submit more than one vote in one transaction**
* **Constitutional Committee details on Governance Actions** (both those up for voting and those that have been ratified or rejected). This will make it easier to see which constitutional committee voted on a specific Governance Action and why they voted in that way, all on the same page.
* **Add support for group proposers** to foster the creation of more governance actions, provide more clarity on-chain about where the proposal comes from
* **Integration with CoSponsor** to allow authors to crowdfund the cost of the Governance Action deposit, hence lowering the barrier for participation to the global community
* Add an **easier way for delegators to identify DReps** by helping find DReps that have voting history aligned with delegators voting principles.
* **Further expand open APIs coverage** to include access to submission for all types of governance actions. This will make it easier for other builders to include this critical feature faster, dramatically lowering the barriers to submit a governance action.
* Generally **expand options for individual contributions to the open source code**. Specifically integrate the GitHub backlog with the Andamio platform to allow anyone to get onboarded to the repos and be rewarded for meaningful contributions to key identified issues
* **Optimise the hosting and deployment infrastructure** to reduce cost and make general maintenance more efficient

#### Governance

The Governance Tools working group in Intersect, is responsible for coordinating efforts related to governance tooling in general, hosting discussions about current and future needs. Over the past 18 months, the working group focused on channeling community direction for the GovTool project. Going forward the working group, on top of supporting broader discussions across tools, will continue supporting the newly formed GovTool consortium, acting also the meeting space for it when useful.

The GovTool Consortium, open to any contributor who actively joins the discussions, will keep collecting input and feedback from the users and owners of GovTool (Cardano Community) and shape the roadmap direction. This will also act as the coordinator to transparently allocate and distribute the incentives of this budget to individual contributors by leveraging the Andamio platform. In the short-term, this group will also help facilitate the open process to award to a builder the hosting and infrastructure maintenance role described in this budget.

#### Vendor Profiles

The **Cardano GovTool Consortium** is made of all the builders currently actively working on the development of GovTool, the builders of tools who leverage GovTool APIs and code, and anyone who actively participates in the Governance tools working group. The following builders who are submitting this governance action are leading the Consortium effort:

* [**LidoNation**](https://www.lidonation.com/en) - Outcomes pillar
* [**ByronNetwork**](https://byron.network) - Delegation & Voting pillars
* [**WeDeliver**](https://we-deliver.io/) - Proposal Discussion & Budget Proposals pillars
* [**Dquadrant**](https://dquadrant.com/) - End-to-end testing

These teams have been building governance tools since before CIP-1694, through SanchoNet GovTool, Voltaire GovTool, and the Chang&Plomin upgrades. All code is open-source and maintained in public repositories, with contributions from a global community of developers.

#### Contract Management

A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between each member of the GovTool consortium (vendor) and Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), administered by Intersect, detailing delivery schedules, milestones, and dispute resolution processes.

#### Project Delivery

Milestones, acceptance criteria, payment amounts, and timelines will be agreed upon between Intersect and the vendors. Vendors will deliver according to the Legal Contract, with milestone completion attested by the vendors and verified by Intersect or a 3rd Party Assurer.

Intersect’s delivery assurance function will monitor progress and communicate status to the community. A 3rd Party Assurer will review and sign off on milestone deliverables before payments are released.

#### Budget Management Tooling

Intersect will use the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs, audited by TxPipe and MLabs. Funds will be held in a Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC) and disbursed to Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSCs) as milestones are met.

The Oversight Committee — consisting of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus, and NMKR — will verify key administrative actions on-chain.

Note: Dquadrant is present within the Oversight Committee and as a builder within the GovTools Consortium, they will abstain from any oversight of GovTool-related contracts.

A public dashboard ([cardanotreasury.fi](http://cardanotreasury.fi)) will allow the community to audit fund flows, track milestones, and verify spending immutably on-chain.

##### Specifics

Intersect will reuse the infrastructure used for the Cardano Blockchain Ecosystem Budget. The same Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), will be used. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. A Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.

The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Xerberus, Dquadrant and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.

For all details on Intersect's configuration, please see the [Smart Contract Guide](https://docs.intersectmbo.org/cardano-facilitation-services/cardano-budget/intersect-administration-services/smart-contracts-as-part-of-our-administration) on the knowledge base.

The high level permissions are as follows:

* TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
* Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-offs must authorize
* TRSC Disperse
* Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
* TRSC Pause and Resume
* Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
* TRSC Sweep
* One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
* TRSC Reorganize
* Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize

##### Processes

Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. The logic of the TRSC and PSSC prevent them from delegating to SPOs, only allowing delegation to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. Thus funds held in administration by these contracts will be delegated to auto-abstain predefined DRep.

When the Legal contract is prepared and the vendor is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.

A dashboard is available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain. Please see [cardanotreasury.fi](http://cardanotreasury.fi).

The subsections; Contract Management, Project Delivery, and Budget Management Tooling described above cover the constitutional requirements specified in Article IV sections 4 and 5.

### References